We are sorry, the requested page does not exist
SC affirms ruling granting bail to ex-Masbate lawmaker, Napoles
The Supreme Court (SC) has affirmed a ruling of the Sandiganbayan that allowed businesswoman Janet Lim-Napoles and former Masbate congresswoman Rizalina Seachone-Laneta to post bail in the plunder charges filed against them in connection with the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) or pork scam......»»
Fuel subsidy easing eyed
An immediate release of government assistance to public utility vehicles will be achieved by shortening the trigger period from three months to one and simplifying the requirements, the Department of Energy said yesterday. The proposal, nonetheless, may need the amendment of the law for releasing fuel subsidies to the transport sector. In a press briefing, Energy Secretary Raphael Lotilla said this was one of President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.’s proposed solutions to the oil price shock that is expected to worsen amid the spreading Middle East conflict. $80 per barrel long breached Under the current law, fuel subsidies are released to the transport sector whenever the Dubai crude oil price exceeds $80 per barrel for three consecutive months. Lotilla said shortening the trigger period will allow the government to release the subsidies faster to the transport sector, one of the sectors most affected by rising fuel prices. “With this simplification or shortening of the period, we will be able to release the subsidies in a shorter period,” Lotilla said. “Since Congress is now considering the General Appropriations Act, it will be included in that process. The amendment will take effect in 2024 immediately upon Congress’s approval of the GAA,” he added. The DoE chief also said the government will simplify the requirements for the release of the fuel subsidies. The release of the subsidies requires the approval of the DoE, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Budget and Management. Lotilla said that under the new proposal, the release of the subsidies will only require the approval of the DBM, DoTr and the DoE. He said the DoTr will finalize the list of beneficiaries for those with franchises, the Department of the Interior and Local Government for tricycle drivers, and the Department of Trade and Industry for delivery service drivers. Even though there’s an effort to expedite assistance, Lotilla said the fuel subsidy in the 2024 national budget was decreased to P2.5 billion from P3 billion this year. The energy chief, however, believes that even with the reduced budget, the required funding will be met. “That’s based on the experience of the previous year. We don’t know what will be the final amount,” the official said. Other measures on table Lotilla added the government will implement a voluntary 20-percent ethanol blend for gasoline, which is targeted for approval by the end of 2023. He said the ethanol blend will help mitigate the rising fuel prices, as ethanol is cheaper than gasoline. Lotilla said the President also instructed him to continue the transport sector’s electrification, particularly for mass transport and light cargo vehicles. He said the government will put in place charging stations and ensure that the benefits to the transport sector, particularly the drivers, will be there. Lotilla said the President also emphasized the need to prepare the economy for the eventual manufacture of electric vehicles and to link this with the local mining sector that will produce the minerals needed to manufacture batteries and other components of electric vehicles. Rules out soon The DoE is also releasing the guidelines for the implementation of the long-delayed higher biofuels blend before the year ends. Lotilla said the current 10-percent ethanol blend, also known as E10, in gasoline would be increased to 20 percent or E20, although it would be a voluntary option for motorists. Lotilla added that the current two percent or B2 coco methyl ester or CME blend on diesel will be adjusted to three percent or B3. Based on the DoE calculation, implementing the E20 blend could slash gasoline prices by around P1.28 to P1.50 per liter. While ethanol is generally cheaper than gasoline, Lotilla noted that local ethanol at P79.49 a liter is still more expensive than the imported supply at P41.84 per liter. Lotilla said DoE will bank on the coconut industry, whose production reaches up to 15 billion nuts annually, to complement the B3 shift. “An additional 1 percent blend only needs 2.6 billion nuts. The increase in the blend can also drive down the cost of CME because there will be a bigger market for it. Right now, we expect pure diesel to be at parity with the per liter price of CME,” Lotilla explained. With Maria Romero The post Fuel subsidy easing eyed appeared first on Daily Tribune......»»
Govt to shorten trigger period for fuel subsidies
The government will shorten the trigger period for releasing fuel subsidies to the transport sector from three months to one month, and simplify the requirements for its release, the Department of Energy said on Tuesday. In a Malacañang Press Briefing, Energy Secretary Raphael Lotilla said this was one of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s decisions during the latest sectoral meeting. Under the current law, fuel subsidies are released to the transport sector whenever the Dubai crude oil price exceeds $80 per barrel for three consecutive months. Lotilla said the shortening of the trigger period will allow the government to release the subsidies faster to the transport sector, which is one of the sectors most affected by the rising fuel prices. "With this simplification or shortening of the period, we will be able to release the subsidies in a shorter period of time," Lotilla said. "Since Congress is right now considering the General Appropriations Act, it will be included in that process. The amendment will take effect in 2024 immediately upon Congress's approval of the GAA," he added. The DOE chief also said the government will simplify the requirements for the release of the fuel subsidies. The release of the subsidies requires the approval of the DOE, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Budget and Management. Lotilla said that under the new proposal, the release of the subsidies will only require the approval of the DBM, the DOTr, and the DOE. He said the DOTr will finalize the list of beneficiaries of the fuel subsidies for those with franchises, the Department of Interior and Local Government for tricycle drivers, and the Department of Trade and Industry for delivery service drivers. Even though there's an effort to expedite assistance distribution, Lotilla mentioned that the fuel subsidy allocation in the 2024 national budget was decreased from P3 billion this year to P2.5 billion. However, he believes that the reduced budget will still be adequate to meet the required funding. "That’s based on the experience on the previous year. We don't know what will be the final amount,” the official said. Other measures Lotilla also said that the government will implement a voluntary 20 percent ethanol blend for gasoline, which is targeted for approval by the end of 2023. He said the ethanol blend will help mitigate the rising fuel prices, as ethanol is cheaper than gasoline. Lotilla said the President also instructed to continue the transport sector's electrification, particularly mass transport and light cargo vehicles. He said the government will put in place charging stations and ensure that the benefits to the transport sector, particularly the drivers, will be there. Lotilla said the President also emphasized the need to prepare the economy for the eventual manufacture of electric vehicles in the country, and linking this up with the local mining sector that will produce the minerals needed to produce batteries and other components of electric vehicles......»»
Increased subsidy sought for jeepney drivers affected by PUV modernization
Senator Win Gatchalian urged the government to increase the subsidy provided under the modernization program for public utility vehicles. During the recent Senate deliberation on the 2024 proposed budget of the Department of Transportation, Gatchalian said the program is pushing jeepney drivers to save a portion of income to pay for the modern vehicle. The senator also lamented program was introduced at a time when fuel costs ranged from $20 to $30 per barrel. Fuel prices have since increased to a range of $80 to $90 per barrel due to the Russian-Ukraine conflict, he stressed. Meanwhile, Gatchalian said the DoTR should make sure all jeepney engines are at least Euro-4 and Philippine National Standards-compliant under the PUV modernization program. "From the briefers that I read, the compliance rate right now is only at 60 percent and the allocation for the modernization for 2024 is zero. In other words, we compel them to modernize but we don't have any support to give them in the next few years," he said. Gatchalian said increasing the subsidy should form part of the DOTr's strategy to achieve at least 100 percent modernization of the country's PUVs. The DoTr earlier said one unit of modernized PUV costs P2.4 million to 2.8 million. At the hearing, Transportation Secretary Jaime Bautista told the committee panel that the DoTr will continue giving equity subsidies to all PUV drivers and operators to help them replace the old units that they currently operate. Bautista said they have already requested at least P1.6 billion fund for the program for next year. Gatchalian cited the deadline for the modernization program was earlier suspended to allow individual jeepney operators to consolidate themselves into a cooperative. The deadline for consolidation has been set for December 31 this year. "It's a step towards the right direction that we are modernizing through the cooperatives," Gatchalian said. DoTr earlier said that certain private sector groups are interested in venturing into manufacturing modernized PUVs “which could keep the cost in the lower end of the range.” The post Increased subsidy sought for jeepney drivers affected by PUV modernization appeared first on Daily Tribune......»»
Oil tax freeze clash looms
Senate Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel III yesterday supported — while Finance Secretary Benjamin Diokno strongly opposed — a proposal to suspend the excise tax on imported oil products amid the skyrocketing fuel prices at the pump. “Every week, our fellow Filipinos face the challenge of ever-increasing fuel prices. They need a lifeline now. I hope the government understands the gravity of the situation and the urgency of intervention to alleviate their hardship,” Pimentel said. “The suspension of the excise tax would offer a temporary respite and serve as an effective lifeboat for Filipinos struggling to cope with the sky-high fuel prices,” he stressed. House Deputy Majority Leader and ACT-CIS Partylist Representative Erwin Tulfo on Monday proposed a three-month suspension of the excise tax on imported oil and bio-ethanol to address the continuing surge in oil prices. Tulfo’s proposal to temporarily suspend the excise tax until December came after Speaker Martin Romualdez held a meeting with representatives of the oil industry players on the same day. In a media briefing, Tulfo gave the impression that the House leadership would be inclined to recommend to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. the suspension of the fuel excise tax. For Pimentel, suspending the excise tax would “unburden” many Filipinos from the expected increase in the prices of basic commodities. “The rising cost of crude oil will ultimately be borne by every Filipino because it leads to increased prices of goods, electricity, and more,” he said. Earlier, oil companies raised gasoline and kerosene prices by P2 per liter, with a more significant increase of P2.50 per liter for diesel. Diesel and kerosene prices in the last 11 consecutive weeks rose by a cumulative P17.30 and P15.95 per liter, respectively, while gasoline prices in the last 10 weeks climbed by P11.85 per liter. The global price of crude oil from the United States has risen to $92 per barrel, while European crude has increased to $95 per barrel since November last year. ‘Only rich will benefit’ But Diokno quickly put a damper on Tulfo’s proposal, saying that suspending the excise tax on petroleum products would benefit only the rich and severely damage the economy. “We recognize the public sentiment to address the elevated fuel prices. However, as the government, it is our responsibility to be cautious in implementing policies that could negatively impact the macro-fiscal stability and sustainability of the country,” he told reporters. Suspending the excise tax would be “regressive,” Diokno said, as it would delay infrastructure and social development projects for long-term economic growth under the Marcos administration, which aims to make the country a predominantly upper middle-income society by 2025. He pointed out that only the top 10 percent of households with the highest incomes would benefit from a suspension as they consume nearly 50 percent of all fuels. He noted that the lower half of households use up only 10 percent of all oil-based fuels. “When you formulate policy, you always think of what’s the greatest good for the greatest number,” Diokno said. Likewise, suspending the excise tax on fuel would not help stave off inflation in the long run, he added. “Any of the proposals will adversely affect our economic and fiscal recovery, our international credit rating, and our overall debt management strategy,” he said. He explained that the government would lose billions in revenue if it suspended the excise tax on fuel and its associated value-added tax. For the fourth quarter of 2023 alone, Diokno said, the losses in government revenue from foregone VAT and fuel excise taxes would reach P31.2 billion and P72.6 billion, respectively. Doom and gloom “In total, for the whole year of 2024, the government will lose P280.5 billion,” he said. Diokno averred that the lost revenue would lead to a higher budget deficit — from 5.1 percent to 6.2 percent of gross domestic product — and a higher debt-to-GDP ratio in 2024 of 60.2 percent to 61.3 percent. With a restricted revenue collection, Diokno added, the government will be forced to borrow more to support its projects and to repurpose some of its future revenues to debt payments. “Higher borrowings will further increase our interest payments and budget deficit in the future,” he said. The solution, Diokno said, is to give targeted subsidies to those who will be most negatively affected by the higher fuel prices, such as jeepney drivers, farmers and fishermen. He also said that eliminating the fuel tax would require time-consuming legislative action. “Once the elevated oil prices subside, it may not be easy to restore the taxes on oil products. It is politically unpopular. That’s the political economy of tax legislation. This has serious implications for fiscal sustainability,” he warned. The post Oil tax freeze clash looms appeared first on Daily Tribune......»»
Speaker has spoken
Deliberations on the 2024 national budget — proposed at P5.768 trillion — reveal what appear to be pork barrel funds embedded in the National Expenditure Program submitted to Congress. The House leadership, however, has guaranteed that the discretionary funds, which are the nature of pork barrel, will be pared off. Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez said the House of Representatives will “scrutinize and deliberate” on the budget items before the NEP is passed before the end of the year. “We will make sure in Congress that every centavo Filipinos pay in taxes is spent wisely and returned to the nation through relevant programs and projects. Every peso that goes to the treasury will go back to benefit the people,” Romualdez vowed. The early submission of the NEP gives both the House and the Senate enough time to review its many items. Much of the suspected pork is conveniently tucked into bigger items while the rest are distributed among regional offices to make them less conspicuous. Among the lump sums in the budget are the P733.2-billion Special Purpose Funds which are considered the “Executive’s” pork barrel for responding to sudden spending requirements. The NEP defines it as an appropriation to cover expenditures for specific purposes for which recipient agencies have not yet been identified. The proposed SPF budget represents a P219.8-billion increase from the current P513.6-billion allocation. The Miscellaneous Personnel Benefits Fund, or MPBF, will increase by more than 400 percent or to P135.7 billion next year from P26.6 billion in the 2023 budget. Under the NEP, the special provisions on the use of the MPBF state that the fund can be used for “deficiencies in authorized salaries, bonuses, allowances, associated premiums and other similar personnel benefits of national government personnel, including the requirements for the filling of and the creation of positions, and compensation adjustments, as may be authorized by law, the President of the Philippines, or the DBM.” Another provision allows the government to hire contractual employees. Romualdez gave his word that none of the amounts in the record-setting General Appropriations Act would be allocated for buying political patronage. In several past budget deliberations, it was always the House that was under scrutiny for pork, particularly its top rungs. Now that the House has received the budget early, it and the Senate have started looking into the details “to make sure that the funds that came from taxpayers will be spent wisely. We have to scrutinize every peso and every centavo that government agencies are seeking,” Romualdez emphasized. “We want to give our people their money’s worth through the quality education of their children, the building of infrastructure to create jobs, and programs that will lower the cost of products in the market,” Romualdez added. His assurance to the people provides a safeguard to attempts to reintroduce the system that the Supreme Court had rejected as unconstitutional. At the moment, Congress is running through every agency’s proposal with a fine-tooth comb, looking for suspicious items that could fall under the definition of pork barrel. The gauge for the invalid pork barrel is funds that are left to the discretion of those who will spend it, including legislators whose mandate it is to craft laws and not to implement projects. The post Speaker has spoken appeared first on Daily Tribune......»»
Pork’s different strokes
Efforts have begun in the House of Representatives to raise the Motor Vehicle Road Users Charge or the Road Users Tax after President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. identified the levy as a main source of precious funds. The eagerness of the members of the House to comply with the proposal to hike the tax makes people wary. Proceeds from the tax are the favorite source of legislative pork. Albay Rep. Joey Salceda’s bill indicates the MVUC which ranges from P120 to P4,000 will be raised to between P2,080 and P10,400 for cars, depending on their gross weight. Under the proposal, the MVUC will be increased by a fixed rate yearly until 2025, and by 5 percent from 2026 onwards. Salceda is looking at collecting P151 billion more in revenue from 2024 to 2027 through the higher MVUC. The higher collections should be earmarked for road improvements which is under the Department of Public Works and Highways after President Rodrigo Duterte signed a law abolishing the graft-tainted Road Board. The disposition of the MVUC sparked the feud between House members and the Department of Budget and Management during the initial years of the Duterte term after then Budget Secretary Ben Diokno refused to release the MUVC proceeds until the Road Board was dissolved. Moreover, the late former President Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III exploited the RUT funds using them as leverage to get House members to impeach former Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez and to obtain the legislators’ approval for his political agenda, such as a measure seeking to postpone the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao election to allow Noynoy to place his appointees in the Muslim region. The Road Board had an unusual collection setup that practically freed its state audit, making it a perfect “cash cow” as termed by some senators. Gutierrez was impeached overwhelmingly in the House after Noynoy first dangled the pork barrel, saying through his House allies that those who would vote against the impeachment would not receive their pork barrel while those who signed the measure would get a P20-million bonus taken from the Road Board.Later, Gutierrez, knowing that she was in a losing situation, resigned from her post despite her having a guaranteed term. She was replaced by Noynoy’s favorite associate justice, Conchita Carpio-Morales, who carried out the yellow brand of selective justice. Gutierrez had displeased Noynoy when she dismissed the case against former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in connection with the P729-million fertilizer fund scam. Former Chief Justice Renato Corona Jr. was also ousted through impeachment and the leverage used, in turn, were the DAP funds. It was ironic that Noynoy’s allies vowed to abolish the Road Board, which under the law that created it, had full discretion on its use. Its disposition was beyond the scope of the Commission on Audit since the RUT was not part of the budget. Former Sen. Franklin Drilon, for instance, said the body would be abolished by the Senate despite the House allies of former President Arroyo’s withdrawal and eventual rescinding of the bill that sought to terminate the anomalous 2001 creation. Congressmen turned the RUT proceeds into a source of fast money through collusion with Road Board officials. Since the DPWH is now the custodian of the funds, attention must also be directed at the agency in the proper disposition of the MUVC proceeds. Increasing the audit-free funds plus the recently discovered P215 billion in insertions in the budget through the generic flood mitigation projects exposed maneuvers to pilfer public funds. The post Pork’s different strokes appeared first on Daily Tribune......»»
Respect the budget
A fair reminder should be issued to the caretakers of public finances and leaders in government that the Supreme Court had ruled that lump sum items such as the Priority Development Assistance Fund and the reallocation of funds in the budget such as in the Disbursement Acceleration Program scheme are unconstitutional. A 2013 decision of the high tribunal was very specific about the pork barrel as invalid, along with similar efforts in the legislature to accumulate discretionary funds. In 2014, the SC also thumbed down the Presidential pork barrel raised through the DAP. In the 2024 National Expenditure Program which is the Executive’s proposed budget submitted to Congress, P215 billion worth of flood mitigation projects were found to use methods that are suspiciously similar to the outlawed PDAF scheme. Based on SC’s landmark decision such budget items are also illegal. The SC ruling not only struck down the PDAF but also “various Congressional insertions” and other similar practices that allow legislators to “intervene, assume or participate” in any of the various post-enactment stages of the budget execution. The difference in the current maneuver is that the insertions are done in the NEP to skirt the “post-enactment stages” of the budget process as specified in the SC ruling. The spirit or substance of the decision was, however, all about removing the discretionary powers of Congress over, what the SC decision stated, as a Constitutional violation: “Such as but not limited to the areas of project identification, modification and revision of project identification, fund release and/or fund realignment, unrelated to the power of Congressional oversight.” The ruling basically disallowed the practice of insertions and realignment since it sought to re-establish check and balance between the legislature and the Palace as the pork barrel scheme is the Executive’s leverage to get members of the legislature to enact its priority laws. After the SC ruling, efforts to create new sources of legislative pork have been a yearly ritual in Congress that even resulted in friction between House leaders and the Department of Budget and Management during the early years of President Rodrigo Duterte. The DAP was created apparently to fill the vacuum created by the PDAF’s removal. Under the Palace scheme under the Aquino administration, savings were centralized under the DAP which was then used as a slush fund for legislators. DAP funds were used in the campaign to oust the late Chief Justice Renato Corona. The SC decision disallowed the following: * The withdrawal of unobligated allotments from the implementing agencies and the declaration of the withdrawn unobligated allotments and unreleased appropriations as savings before the end of the fiscal year and without complying with the statutory definition of savings contained in the General Appropriations Act; * Cross-border transfers of savings of the executive department to offices outside the executive department; and * Funding of projects, activities, and programs not covered by appropriations in the General Appropriations Act. The court also declared void the use of unprogrammed funds despite the absence of a certification by the National Treasurer that the revenue collections exceeded the revenue targets or non-compliance with the conditions provided in the relevant General Appropriations Act. Some P150 billion in public funds, from 2011 to 2013, were channeled to the DAP, which was done through the first two schemes that the SC declared as unconstitutional. The SC made a statement in junking the DAP and PDAF which was to outlaw the use of discretionary or lump sum funds in the budget that usually end up in the pockets of public officials. The P24 billion annual PDAF was a mere part of the huge Special Purpose Funds which in turn is just one of the many lump sums that make up as much as a third of the yearly budget. The ruling was consistent with the public clamor for the removal of all types of lump-sum items in the national budget. Undertaking budget maneuvers such as spending a ridiculous P215 billion for flood control has the obvious aim of providing legislators their pork allocation that contravenes the SC ruling on PDAF and public sentiment on the proper use of the budget. The post Respect the budget appeared first on Daily Tribune......»»
Irony of corruption
Corruption has become so pervasive and brazen. Masusuka ka na (you would puke),” moaned the mayor of Dumaguete City, Felipe Remollo, at the convening Thursday of a coalition of over a hundred chiefs of local government units calling for good governance and an end to corruption at all levels of government starting within their own turfs. The coalition was sparked by Baguio City Mayor Benjamin Magalong, a former Philippine National Police official who, in a virtual speech delivered during a PNP flag-raising ceremony last July, said he was “shocked” by the gargantuan increase in the country’s national debt to nearly P14 trillion. Said Magalong: “When President Duterte started his administration, our national debt was at P5.7 trillion, accumulated over the past decades. In just seven years, our national debt increased by 142 percent; we’re now at P13.86 trillion (actually P14.10 trillion, as reported by the Bureau of the Treasury in May 2023).” He quoted then-NEDA Secretary Karl Chua as saying that the country’s ability to pay the national debt is dependent on “‘our ability to manage financial leakages.’ And so I ask, ano ba yung financial leakages (what are financial leakages)? And Sec. Chua replied, ‘ang financial leakage na sinasabi ko (that I’m telling you), a big chunk of that is attributed to corruption.’” Beyond shock, he said he was also alarmed that none of the members of Congress then and now seemed to be concerned enough to “raise hell” about the country’s tremendously rising national debt. Interviewed over local television, he said he had spoken with contractors whom he asked, “Assuming I take cuts from infrastructure projects, how much will my take be? Their answer? From 10 percent to as much as 20, 25 percent — it’s up to the mayors and lawmakers to decide how much.” Bids and awards committee members, among others, also receive commissions, thus only about 45-50 percent is left for the contractor to do the project, he learned. If the project is worth, say P100, they’ll settle for from P42.50 to P55, including their profit, so they’ll have no choice but to make sub-standard projects. Having spent 38 years of exemplary service in the Philippine National Police, retired in 2016 as Deputy Chief of Operations with a total of 166 medals to his name, including the Distinguished Conduct Star, Distinguished Service Star, and PNP Gold Cross for combat and law enforcement achievements, he said: “We in the uniformed service are willing to give up a reasonable percentage of our pension to help the national government address this huge deficit, to address this big national debt; but we have yet to hear from our legislators that they too are willing to give up their pork barrel. Let’s wait and see what our brave legislators have to say.” In the interest of objectivity, it should be said here that Baguio, in two instances, was the subject of a Commission on Audit flag-down. One instance involved Magalong’s admission that rules were eased by City Hall in the purchase of food for city residents and disinfectant at the height of the Luzon lockdown during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2021. He said, however, that all the lockdown expenses were properly accounted for. CoA likewise flagged the city government on allegations that it had diversified funds to complete an infrastructure project. City Administrator Bonifacio Dela Peña maintained that the local government used the DPWH fund for its intended purpose, explaining that city hall only had a P341-million budget for a Convergence Center and it needed P50 million more to complete the project. “The word ‘misuse’ is not true. The fund was well-audited and it went to where it was allotted,” said Dela Peña. It is heartening to see that a cry in the wilderness sparks action among mayors. Theirs is a cause worthy of support by all sectors, including business and the citizenry, and we wish them all the luck in what is certain to be “an uphill climb” of sincerity and political will. The post Irony of corruption appeared first on Daily Tribune......»»
BBM, Tribune share good gov’t journey
When Daily Tribune was started in 2000, President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. or BBM was Ilocos Norte Governor, and both newspaper and the namesake of his father, who was also a President, started on paths that frequently crossed. For instance, it was the Tribune, on 23 September 2013, that broke the story on the use of the Disbursement Acceleration Program or DAP during the Senate impeachment trial of then-Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona. That revelation by BBM — who had thought the money used in the impeachment trial had come from the Priority Development Assistance Fund that the Supreme Court had ruled unconstitutional in 2013 — started the public scrutiny of the presidential pork barrel. Former Budget Secretary Florencio Abad then came out to admit the creation of the fund which he claimed was part of the fiscal stimulus program to counter the effects of a financial crisis that hit the Asian region in 2008. Aquino slush fund The DAP was later proven to be a Palace slush fund for legislators to do its whims and the acts creating it were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2014. BBM, then a senator, told Daily Tribune in an exclusive interview about the use of a supposed stimulus fund of the administration of former President Benigno Aquino III to bribe six senators who sat as judges in the Senate impeachment court for them to vote for the conviction of Corona in May 2012. Marcos said the Department of Budget and Management released P475 million in lump sum allocations to the six senators through the Department of Agrarian Reform that was made to appear as funds for livelihood projects. BBM said the funds were actually used to “induce” the senator-judges to convict Corona. Abad DAP author Abad, in January 2012, said P72.11 billion of those funds juggled from the budget was used for DAP, and the bulk of it was released to agencies and government-owned or -controlled corporations in 2011. Marcos said P100 million was released to him as part of the P475 million the DBM had allocated in six special allotment release orders or SARO, all with the same date of 6 December 2011 and made available through notices of cash allocation a year after. In a privilege speech two days after the Marcos interview, Senator Jinggoy Estrada accused Senate President Franklin Drilon of using discretionary funds to influence the impeachment proceedings against Corona. (To be continued) The post BBM, Tribune share good gov’t journey appeared first on Daily Tribune......»»
Cinemalaya winner ‘Blue Room’ to screen exclusively in Cinema ’76 this June
Indie rock movie Blue Room gets its first theatrical run since its big win at the 18th Cinemalaya Philippine Independent Film Festival starting 7 June only at Cinema ’76 Film Society. Blue Room tells the story of a progressive rock band of privileged teenagers who get arrested for drug possession and are brought into the “Blue Room” where they must make the difficult choice between freedom or standing up for what they believe in. The film bagged multiple awards at last year’s Cinemalaya, including Special Jury Prize, Best Direction for Ma-An Asuncion-Dagñalan, Best Cinematography for Neil Daza, Best Supporting Actor for Soliman Cruz and Best Production Design for Marxie Maolen Fadul. Blue Room also participated at the 74th Locarno Film Festival as a Pro-Online Delegate (as Producer). It was also a post-production grantee of the National Commission for the Culture and the Arts in 2021 as well as the Film Development Council of the Philippines’ CreatePHFilms Small Budget Production Fund recipient. The film stars actor-musician Juan Karlos as the band’s lead vocalist, Harvey Bautista, Nourijune, Keoni Jin and Elijah Canlas. Also in the film are Soliman Cruz, Bombi Plata, Jericho Arceo, Bon Lentejas and Richard Cepeda. Distributed by TBA Studios, Blue Room opens at Cinema ’76 Film Society Tomas Morato on 7 June. A talkback session with the director and cast will be held for one of the screenings on that day. The post Cinemalaya winner ‘Blue Room’ to screen exclusively in Cinema ’76 this June appeared first on Daily Tribune......»»
Sandigan junks ‘pork’ raps vs ex-DBM exec
The Sandiganbayan has dismissed the charges filed against former undersecretary Mario Relampagos of the Department of Budget and Management in connection with his supposed involvement in the alleged misuse of the Priority Development Assistant Fund or pork barrel of former Masbate third district representative Rizalina Seachon-Lanete......»»
The ‘pork-barrel’ evolutions
There is no single item of the so-called “pork-barrel” funds can be found in the P5.268-trillion budget that will be signed into law today by President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr......»»
2023 budget should be purged of hidden ‘pork’ – Lagman
Taking his cue from the P544-billion purported pork barrel funds, Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman yesterday called for the purging of hidden lump sums in the national budget for 2023......»»
Lacson frowns at ‘pork hunter’ tag
Sen. Panfilo M. Lacson, a staunch anti-pork barrel advocate, does not like the name ‘’pork hunter’’ ascribed to him. Senator Panfilo M. Lacson (SENATE OF THE PHILIPPINES / MANILA BULLETIN FILE PHOTO) ‘’I don’t like it. I’m just doing my job,’’ Lacson said as he disagreed with Senate President Vicente C. Sotto III who had presumed ‘’regularity’’ on the “institutional amendments’’ by the House of Representatives (HoR) on the proposed 2021 General Appropriations Bill (GAB or national budget) after the House recently passed the measure on third and final reading. Lacson and Senate Minority Leader Franklin M. Drilon had cited some P326 billion ‘’lump sum’’ appropriations tucked in the proposed P666-billion budget of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). Both cited a Supreme Court decision that lump sum appropriations are unconstitutional. Lump sum appropriations are suspected as ‘’pork barrel’’ appropriations. Lacson has been on the prowl every budget season, picking out suspected pork barrel appropriations in the GAB. The Senate is expected to receive from the House a soft copy of the budget on Oct. 28. Asked during an ANC interview if he believes a statement of Speaker Lord Allan Velasco that there is no pork in the GAB, only institutional amendments, Lacson replied: ‘’We have yet to see the transmitted copy of the GAB as approved on third and final reading, as transmitted to the Senate.’’ ‘’Until we see that, we cannot really tell or say if there’s pork or not in the House of Representatives version of the budget.’’ On a query whether amending budget after third and final reading is unconstitutional, Lacson said: ‘’That is clearly unconstitutional.’’ ‘’It’s very clear, there’s no other interpretation in that provision under the Constitution that after the third and final reading of any bill, including the GAB, no amendment shall be allowed thereto,’’ he said. ‘’I don’t see any other interpretation of that particular provision. So since they already passed on third reading the HoR version of the GAB, I see no reason why they will allow a small committee to introduce further amendments. Based on what I heard from Rep. Eric Yap, the Appropriations committee chairman, he said the amendments will not be coming from the congressmen but from the agencies,’’ he stated. ‘’Again, that’s another violation. We have a four-phase budget process. Budget preparation, authorization, execution, and accountability. We are now in the authorization phase. And only the Congress of the Philippines is allowed to participate in the authorization phase. Tapos na ang sa (the) Executive department (has completed its job in the) preparation phase. Ang execution, after napirmahan ng Presidente ang enrolled bill and when DBM starts disbursing allocations, doon mag-start ang execution. So agencies under the Executive branch cannot be allowed to participate in the authorization phase of the budget process. Sotto had said that he would presume regularity after the House made institutional amendments worth P20 billion, including P5.5 billion, for COVID-19 vaccines. Lacson stressed that amendments to the budget by the House small committee is unconstitutional. ‘’To say there’s presumption of regularity, I think it’s misplaced. If that is the output of the small committee and they will include these amendments in the USB drive they will transmit to us on Oct. 28, then we cannot presume regularity, with all due respect to my Senate President…because if it is based on an unconstitutional act, I cannot presume regularity,’’ he added......»»
Pork barrel sinisilip sa 2021 nat’l budget
Manila, Philippines – Nangangamba ang mga kaalyado ni House Speaker Lord Allan Velasco na may pork barrel funds na naisingit sa 2021 national budget. Kaya naman pinayagan ng House Leadeship na makapagsumite pa ng mga individual amendments sa General Appropriations Bill ang mga mambabataas hanggang sa Oktubte 19 para mabago pa ang ilan sa alokasyon […] The post Pork barrel sinisilip sa 2021 nat’l budget appeared first on REMATE ONLINE......»»
MONEY HEIST: Smoke and mirrors in the 2021 proposed national budget
Opposition legislators were quick to spot this brazen attempt to revive the pork barrel system, as the NTF-ELCAC is set to receive a 2,969 percent increase in its budget – from P622.3 million in 2020 to a whopping P19.1 billion in 2021. The post MONEY HEIST: Smoke and mirrors in the 2021 proposed national budget appeared first on Bulatlat......»»
Esperon debunks ‘pork barrel’ tag on P16.4-B budget for barangay dev’t program
National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon defended the proposed budget of the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC). He assured the public that it will be used to develop barangays and not for electioneering. The post Esperon debunks ‘pork barrel’ tag on P16.4-B budget for barangay dev’t program appeared first on Manila Bulletin......»»
Año sa House panel: Paggagamitan ng P16.B barangay fund ‘to follow’
Manila, Philippines – Nilinaw ni Interior Secretary Eduardo Año na ang nakatabing P16.4 bilyong budget sa national budget sa 2021 ay hindi sa pork barrel allocation ng botohan sa 2022. Sa pagdinig, sinabi ni Año na may mga proyektong nakalatag sa proposed P244.3-billion budget. “Mayroon na po tayong initial listing po, ito po ay isinubmit […] The post Año sa House panel: Paggagamitan ng P16.B barangay fund ‘to follow’ appeared first on REMATE ONLINE......»»
Palace denies lump sum items in 2020 budget
There are no lump sum items in the proposed 2021 budget, Malacañang said yesterday, as it assured the public that the administration had complied with the court ruling that struck down “pork barrel” as unconstitutional......»»